<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should learners be learning intro to Javascript?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/</link>
	<description>Living and learning for life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-2434</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/#comment-2434</guid>
		<description>It would... it was a computer science degree. But it&#039;s a 1 year course where Javascript (the only programming therein) is one unit out of 25...

I don&#039;t think the course is meant to give people a background in computer programming - just a few skills using Javascript so that when, as a Web Designer, they have to plug in some script, they know their way around to do so... but then the &lt;a href=&quot;http://210.9.70.37/cgi-bin/waxhtml/~ntis2/unit.wxh?page=80&amp;inputRef=36343&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;actual requirements of the unit&lt;/a&gt; go way beyond that to write your own code to fulfil client requirements.  So the unit assumes (in my view) that the learner can already program...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would&#8230; it was a computer science degree. But it&#8217;s a 1 year course where Javascript (the only programming therein) is one unit out of 25&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the course is meant to give people a background in computer programming &#8211; just a few skills using Javascript so that when, as a Web Designer, they have to plug in some script, they know their way around to do so&#8230; but then the <a href="http://210.9.70.37/cgi-bin/waxhtml/~ntis2/unit.wxh?page=80&#038;inputRef=36343" rel="nofollow">actual requirements of the unit</a> go way beyond that to write your own code to fulfil client requirements.  So the unit assumes (in my view) that the learner can already program&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simmo</title>
		<link>http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-2433</link>
		<dc:creator>Simmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/#comment-2433</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know much about the course but wouldn&#039;t it be better to start with a more highly typed language?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know much about the course but wouldn&#8217;t it be better to start with a more highly typed language?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this has come up quite a few times this year, and most people in our course feel the same way... But the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Web_Design/Qualifications/Cert_IV_Websites_Australia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new qualification&lt;/a&gt; we&#039;ve got includes &quot;client side script&quot; as part of the Cert IV course, whereas server-side stuff is in the Diploma...

Another example of the training package being a bit behind the times (a few years ago when JS meant image rollovers etc, it was fine).

Maybe one way around it is to use PHP to introduce people to programming... but I&#039;m not sure about that either... needs to be something fun and visual. People seem mixed with &lt;a href=&quot;http://alice.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alice&lt;/a&gt; (well, lots hate it :( ). I think you&#039;re right Adam - perhaps we should use PHP as the first programming language - even if it means going against the grain of the training package a bit...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this has come up quite a few times this year, and most people in our course feel the same way&#8230; But the <a href="http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Web_Design/Qualifications/Cert_IV_Websites_Australia" rel="nofollow">new qualification</a> we&#8217;ve got includes &#8220;client side script&#8221; as part of the Cert IV course, whereas server-side stuff is in the Diploma&#8230;</p>
<p>Another example of the training package being a bit behind the times (a few years ago when JS meant image rollovers etc, it was fine).</p>
<p>Maybe one way around it is to use PHP to introduce people to programming&#8230; but I&#8217;m not sure about that either&#8230; needs to be something fun and visual. People seem mixed with <a href="http://alice.org" rel="nofollow">Alice</a> (well, lots hate it :( ). I think you&#8217;re right Adam &#8211; perhaps we should use PHP as the first programming language &#8211; even if it means going against the grain of the training package a bit&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simmo</title>
		<link>http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Simmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. JavaScript is something thats very annoying sometimes and I reckon until you&#039;ve covered programming concepts in general its a bad idea to let people use JavaScript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. JavaScript is something thats very annoying sometimes and I reckon until you&#8217;ve covered programming concepts in general its a bad idea to let people use JavaScript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/comment-page-1/#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 02:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveandletlearn.net/should-learners-be-learning-intro-to-javascript/#comment-2430</guid>
		<description>I feel that PHP just makes more sense when learning web design. It&#039;s easier to get ones head around it because, at least at it&#039;s basic levels, PHP integrates more closely with HTML. With JavaScript, to do anything we need all that strange DOM stuff, whereas with PHP we&#039;re still more-or-less using HTML, just with some extra codey bits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that PHP just makes more sense when learning web design. It&#8217;s easier to get ones head around it because, at least at it&#8217;s basic levels, PHP integrates more closely with HTML. With JavaScript, to do anything we need all that strange DOM stuff, whereas with PHP we&#8217;re still more-or-less using HTML, just with some extra codey bits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

